1. Background IntroductionSaito.io presents itself as a web3 infrastructure project focused on building an open-layer for decentralized applications. The platform emphasizes its unique approach to solving blockchain scalability and decentralization trade-offs through innovative routing and consensus mechanisms. With clear messaging about creating "an Internet that pays you," Saito positions itself at the intersection of blockchain infrastructure and open web development.2. Core Website ContentThe website features four primary sections: Technology (explaining their consensus mechanism), Applications (showcasing Saito-based dApps), Network (displaying live node data), and Documentation. Key content includes: 1) Interactive network visualization 2) Technical whitepaper with mathematical proofs 3) Developer tutorials for building on Saito 4) Real-time blockchain statistics dashboard. The design balances technical depth with approachable explanations through animated infographics.3. Technical CharacteristicsSaito's technology stack introduces: 1) Proof-of-Routing consensus combining bandwidth and computation 2) Stateless transaction processing architecture 3) Automatic sharding through network routing. Performance claims include 10,000+ TPS capacity and sub-second finality. The implementation uses WebAssembly for smart contracts and maintains full EVM compatibility while introducing new opcodes for routing rewards.4. Token EconomicsThe SAITO token serves triple purposes: 1) Payment for network bandwidth (burned) 2) Staking for routing nodes 3) Governance voting. With fixed 1.8% annual inflation, the economic model features: 1) 60% of block rewards to routers 2) 30% to block producers 3) 10% to treasury. The website provides detailed emission schedules and interactive calculators for projecting node earnings.5. Competitive ComparisonCompared to Polkadot: Saito offers simpler sharding without parachains but lacks cross-chain messaging. Versus Helium: Both incentivize physical infrastructure but Saito focuses on bandwidth rather than hardware. Key differentiators: 1) No requirement for historical data storage 2) Native integration with traditional web protocols 3) Ability to monetize existing internet infrastructure without specialized equipment.6. Risks and ChallengesPrimary risks include: 1) Unproven security model against sybil attacks 2) Dependence on ISP cooperation for routing rewards 3) Currently 更多>